- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 18:58:43 +0200
- To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
- CC: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org, www-webdav-dasl@w3.org, w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
Lisa Dusseault wrote:
>
> I also think it's a good idea. Again, the draft could specify what the
> server MUST support, depending on what standards it has implemented.
> E.g. if the server has implemented both DeltaV and property data types,
> MUST it return whatever data typing information it has in REPORT responses?
OK.
Issue and resolution:
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-webdav-property-datatypes-latest.html#rfc.issue.other-method-semantics>:
"6. Changes for other methods
Servers that support other methods using the DAV:multistatus response
format (such as the REPORT method defined in [RFC3253], section 3.6)
SHOULD apply the same extensions as defined in Section 5."
Best regards, Julian
--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Friday, 17 September 2004 16:59:18 UTC