Re: Request for feedback: WebDAV property datatype draft

On Sep 13, 2004, at 5:16 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Brian Korver wrote:
>> Because these are conditions describing the state
>> of the world, not (in this context) mandates on
>> server behavior.
>
> Yes, they are.
>
> It says exactly when the server behaviour gets extended (when the type 
> isn't "simple string" *and* if the property isn't defined in RFC2518).
>
> Can you suggest alternative wording that keeps the  RFC2119 
> terminology?
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
> -- 
> <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760

Julian,

I'm officially confused.  Your text states that they
are conditions ("the following conditions"), but you
claim here that they're not.  Anyhow, not worth arguing
about....

-brian
briank@xythos.com