Brian Korver wrote: > > Because these are conditions describing the state > of the world, not (in this context) mandates on > server behavior. Yes, they are. It says exactly when the server behaviour gets extended (when the type isn't "simple string" *and* if the property isn't defined in RFC2518). Can you suggest alternative wording that keeps the RFC2119 terminology? Best regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760Received on Tuesday, 14 September 2004 00:16:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:06 GMT