Lisa Dusseault wrote: > > > At the meeting last week, Ted asked us to make sure we're clear which > BNF format is used in WebDAV. RFC2518 says: > > Since this document describes a set of extensions to the HTTP/1.1 > protocol, the augmented BNF used herein to describe protocol elements > is exactly the same as described in section 2.1 of [RFC2068]. Since > this augmented BNF uses the basic production rules provided in > section 2.2 of [RFC2068], these rules apply to this document as well. > > Is that text sufficient for RFC2518bis as well? If it is not, please > suggest what more is needed. Except for the fact that we want to refer to RFC2616 instead, I don't see any reason why this would need to be changed. Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760Received on Thursday, 12 August 2004 11:43:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:06 GMT