W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > July to September 2004

Re: New issue from meeting

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 13:43:03 +0200
Message-ID: <411B57C7.6060007@gmx.de>
To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
CC: Webdav WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>

Lisa Dusseault wrote:

> At the meeting last week, Ted asked us to make sure we're clear which 
> BNF format is used in WebDAV.  RFC2518 says:
>   Since this document describes a set of extensions to the HTTP/1.1
>    protocol, the augmented BNF used herein to describe protocol elements
>    is exactly the same as described in section 2.1 of [RFC2068].  Since
>    this augmented BNF uses the basic production rules provided in
>    section 2.2 of [RFC2068], these rules apply to this document as well.
> Is that text sufficient for RFC2518bis as well?  If it is not, please 
> suggest what more is needed.

Except for the fact that we want to refer to RFC2616 instead, I don't 
see any reason why this would need to be changed.


<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Thursday, 12 August 2004 11:43:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:30 UTC