W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2004

Re: Issues remaining with Bind draft

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 18:55:59 +0100
Message-ID: <4061CBAF.6090205@gmx.de>
To: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
Cc: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>, Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>, Webdav WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>

Ted Hardie wrote:

> For the custom live properties, could PROPPATCH have an effect that 
> affects only
> the binding address (as noted below, implementations MAY define custom live
> properties which have different values on different bindings)?

Nope, and I absolutely disagree that live properties may vary depending 
on access path.

> I'm trying to work through the implications of this, and having a bit of 
> trouble.
> Does this imply that a method generating this must be applied both to the
> binding against which it was targeted and against some other binding to 
> test
> this?  or does it imply some mechanism of indicating that a property is
> capable fo divergence?  In the second case, how is that discovered/stored?

There must not be any divergence.

 > ...

Regards, Julian


-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Wednesday, 24 March 2004 13:10:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:17:51 UTC