W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2004

Re: Issues remaining with Bind draft

From: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 10:21:39 -0500
To: Webdav WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Message-ID: <OF9CE0D1B6.D4C3669E-ON85256E5E.0018FFEB-85256E5E.00545211@us.ibm.com>

Either way is OK with me.  If it would take you more than a few minutes
to generate a new revision, I'd just last call the 04 version.

Cheers,
Geoff

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote on 03/20/2004 05:14:04 AM:

> Geoffrey M Clemm wrote:
> 
> > How about for REBIND:
> > 
> > (DAV:lock-deleted): If the URL specified in the DAV:href element in 
the 
> > request body was protected by a write-lock at the time of the request, 

> > that write-lock must have been deleted by the request.
> > 
> > And something similar for UNBIND.
> 
> OK, here's the change:
> 
> UNBIND postcondition:
> 
>        (DAV:lock-deleted): If the internal member URI of the binding
>        specified by the Request-URI and the DAV:segment element in the
>        request body was protected by a write-lock at the time of the
>        request, that write-lock must have been deleted by the request.
> 
> REBIND postcondition:
> 
>        (DAV:lock-deleted): If the URL specified in the DAV:href element
>        in the request body was protected by a write-lock at the time of
>        the request, that write-lock must have been deleted by the
>        request.
> 
> (note that for UNBIND the actual URI is composed from request-URI and 
> DAV:segment in the request body).
> 
> 
>  From Geoff's and my point of view, we have now resolved those issues 
> raised by Lisa which indeed warranted a document change. As these 
> changes are minor, we *could* proceed with draft 04 as base for the 
> working group last call, but of course I can also produce a -05 draft 
> early next week and submit that (Opinions?).
> 
> Regards, Julian
> 
> -- 
> <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Sunday, 21 March 2004 10:22:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:17:51 UTC