Re: locking clarifications/extensions vs BIND draft vs RFC2518bis

Elias Sinderson wrote:
> 
> +1, for much the same reasons outlined in Geoff's post below.
> 
> Q: 2518 defines two levels of compliance, depending on whether locking 
> is supported or not - would it make sense to try and extend this 
> approach to cover all of the related specs?
 > ...

I thought that this is what they're doing already?

Julian



-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760

Received on Monday, 2 February 2004 15:34:28 UTC