Re: Depth header in a lock refreshing method

From: Jason Crawford <nn683849@smallcue.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 21:45:24 -0500
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Cc:
Message-ID: <OF636B4043.D6DBCA35-ON85256E11.000E7967-85256E11.000F2158@us.ibm.com>

On Thursday, 01/01/2004 at 10:01 EST, Geoffrey M Clemm wrote:
> I agree with Julian that option 4 is probably best. 

I also agree 

Lisa, do you need this to go on the issues list?

J.

Received on Saturday, 3 January 2004 21:52:55 UTC