Re: ID: draft-ietf-webdav-bind-05

At 8:31 PM +0200 6/23/04, Julian Reschke wrote:
>Ted Hardie wrote:
>
>>Julian,
>>     I didn't say "dav:" was a URI, I said it was a URI
>
>I know you didn't say that. I just wanted to point out, that, in 
>order to be a legal namespace name, "DAV:" would *need* to be a 
>legal URI. Unfortunately it isn't.

That's not my reading of http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xml-names-19990114;
you seem to believe that a URI reference used as namespace cannot be the
bare scheme.  The "qualified names" discussion seems to contradict this
view, at least in my reading.

			regards,
				Ted Hardie