- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 20:31:19 +0200
- To: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
- Cc: Joe Hildebrand <joe@cursive.net>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Ted Hardie wrote: > Julian, > I didn't say "dav:" was a URI, I said it was a URI I know you didn't say that. I just wanted to point out, that, in order to be a legal namespace name, "DAV:" would *need* to be a legal URI. Unfortunately it isn't. > _scheme_; see the URI scheme assignments maintained by > IANA I referenced below. The namespaces used in the bind > draft fall into the DAV: uri scheme if you require > they begin "dav:". But the BIND spec isn't defining any new namespaces, and the only XML namespace is uses is just the one named "DAV:" (defined in RFC2518). Best regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Wednesday, 23 June 2004 14:31:54 UTC