- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:05:09 +0200
- To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
- Cc: Jason Crawford <ccjason@us.ibm.com>
Hi, this issue (<http://www.webdav.org/wg/rfcdev/issues.htm>) reads: "Shouldn’t we be using an IF header to do an UNLOCK seeing as you need to prove you are holding a lock before you can remove it? (This might be contingent on LOCKS_SHOULD_THEY_USE_AN_IF_HEADER_TO_VERIFY)" The tests that I have done (for other UNLOCK related issues) show that servers indeed use the "Lock-Token" request header to indicate the lock to be removed; and that they do not require an additional "If" header. This may have been a valid point before the spec was finished, but now as we're talking about progressing/clarifying the protocol, we should just reject that issue. Jason, can you please update the issues list? I'll update <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-webdav-locking-latest.html#rfc.issue.067_UNLOCK_NEEDS_IF_HEADER> accordingly. Best regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Tuesday, 15 June 2004 03:05:49 UTC