Re: Issue 60: LOCK_REFRESH_BODY

On May 31, 2004, at 9:17 AM, Jason Crawford wrote:

>  > >
>  > > I'd like to confirm that we agree on
>  > >
>  > > - a LOCK creation request MUST have a request body and MUST NOT 
> have a
>  > > Lock-Token request header
>  > >
>  > > - a LOCK refresh request MUST NOT have a request body and MUST 
> have a
>  > > Lock-Token request header
>  >
>  > As nobody spoke up, I'll conclude that this is indeed the case. 
> Jason,
>  > could you please update the issues list accordingly?
>
> Julian seem to support this.  I'll offer a weak vote of support. 
>  Let's hear one more voice.
>
> J.
Agreed.

- Lisa