W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: Issue 60: LOCK_REFRESH_BODY

From: Jason Crawford <ccjason@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 12:17:36 -0400
To: nnw3c-dist-auth___at___w3.org@smallcue.com
Cc:
Message-ID: <OF69E1FEC8.FE014514-ON85256EA5.0057886E-85256EA5.00598006@us.ibm.com>
> > the issue...:
> >
> > "Section 7.8 of RFC 2518 indicates that clients may submit a lock
> > refresh without a body. However, it implies that clients could submit 
a
> > lock refresh with a body. Server implementations have been disallowing 
a
> > lock refresh with a body. It might make sense to codify this practice,
> > and disallow submission of a body on a lock refresh.
> >
> > Raised by Rickard Falk:
> > 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2000JulSep/0039.html"
> >
> > I'd like to confirm that we agree on
> >
> > - a LOCK creation request MUST have a request body and MUST NOT have a
> > Lock-Token request header
> >
> > - a LOCK refresh request MUST NOT have a request body and MUST have a
> > Lock-Token request header
> 
> As nobody spoke up, I'll conclude that this is indeed the case. Jason,
> could you please update the issues list accordingly?

Julian seem to support this.  I'll offer a weak vote of support.  Let's 
hear one more voice.

J.
Received on Monday, 31 May 2004 12:18:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:06 GMT