W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: Issue 60: LOCK_REFRESH_BODY

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 15:21:01 +0200
Message-ID: <40BB313D.6020107@gmx.de>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org

Julian Reschke wrote:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> the issue...:
> 
> "Section 7.8 of RFC 2518 indicates that clients may submit a lock 
> refresh without a body. However, it implies that clients could submit a 
> lock refresh with a body. Server implementations have been disallowing a 
> lock refresh with a body. It might make sense to codify this practice, 
> and disallow submission of a body on a lock refresh.
> 
> Raised by Rickard Falk:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2000JulSep/0039.html"
> 
> I'd like to confirm that we agree on
> 
> - a LOCK creation request MUST have a request body and MUST NOT have a 
> Lock-Token request header
> 
> - a LOCK refresh request MUST NOT have a request body and MUST have a 
> Lock-Token request header

As nobody spoke up, I'll conclude that this is indeed the case. Jason, 
could you please update the issues list accordingly?

Best regards, Julian


-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Monday, 31 May 2004 09:21:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:06 GMT