Geoffrey M Clemm wrote: > Sounds good to me. > Cheers, > Geoff > > Julian wrote on 05/23/2004 04:39:10 PM: > >>now that the ACL spec is published, we *should* create a new place for >>collecting spec issues (and hopefully their resolutions). For instance, >>this would include the last-minute change that in we end we did not do: >> >> <http://mailman.webdav.org/pipermail/acl/2004-April/001817.html> >> >>For me the simplest way to do this is to create a document >>"draft-reschke-rfc3744bis" (starting with a copy of RFC3744), and add >>issue markers to the spec itself. I can then automatically create an >>issue list document. >> >>If there aren't any objections to that approach, I'll implement that >>sometime next week. OK, the issues list is online at <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-rfc3744bis-latest.html> (you may want to link from webdav.org/acl to it, Geoff). Best regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760Received on Thursday, 27 May 2004 05:30:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:06 GMT