- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 02:02:44 +0200
- To: Stanley Guan <stanley.guan@oracle.com>
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Stanley Guan wrote: > If a server's implementation decides to treat locks with depth of > infinity as depth of 1, what's the recommended way for a > server receiving requests of locks with depth of infinity? I'd say that's a bug. > 1) reject it and responded with detailed information Yes. > 2) accept it silently Never. > 3) or others? > > What's the recommended way for the servers to reveal the above > fact programmatically? No idea. What's the benefit of a depth: 1 lock??? Maybe this is just a misunderstanding, and what you really want is a depth: 0 lock on a collection? Best regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Tuesday, 25 May 2004 20:03:20 UTC