W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: [ACL] Re: Last minute ACL stuff (was DAV:unauthenticated usage)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 21:06:23 +0200
Message-ID: <4082D1AF.7000409@gmx.de>
To: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
Cc: acl@webdav.org, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org

Geoffrey M Clemm wrote:

> I agree that it makes sense to remove the "protected" qualifier.
> Julian: Can you take care of this?
> 
> Cheers,
> Geoff

We're talking about ... 
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-acl-latest.html#PROPERTY_inherited-acl-set> 
and Eric's request on the ACL mailing list 
(<http://mailman.webdav.org/pipermail/acl/2004-April/001815.html>).


I agree that servers should be allowed not to protect that property. I'm 
not so sure about the best wording, how about saying...:

To stay consistent with other property descriptions, I'd prefer to 
remove the word "protected" but also to add...:

"Servers MAY implement DAV:inherited-acl-set as protected property."

I'll make that change for now; if people feel we shouldn't make that 
change they need to speak up *now*, as we are currently doing the last 
edits on the *RFC* document which then will be published Really Soon.

Regards, Julian


-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Sunday, 18 April 2004 15:07:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:06 GMT