W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2003

Re: BIND vs RFC3253

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 22:43:18 +0100
Message-ID: <3FF1F176.9030606@gmx.de>
To: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
Cc: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>, webdav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>

Ted Hardie wrote:

>>ever, looking at <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rfc-editor-rfc2223bis-07.txt>, section 2.11:
>>
>>        Updates
>>
>>           Specifies an earlier document whose contents are modified or
>>           augmented by the new document.  The new document cannot be
>>           used alone, it can only be used in conjunction with the
>>           earlier document.
>>
>>So maybe we need to leave it as is...
>>
> 
> 
> Why doesn't "augmented" cover this case?  My reading of the text above is
> that "it can only be used in conjunction with the earlier document" _for_the_
> areas_of_overlap.  That is, you can update RFC XXXX and still have
> material that is stand alone that is not overlapping with RFC XXXX.

Well, that would make sense, but in that case maybe 
draft-rfc-editor-rfc2223bis should be clarified...

Regards, Julian

-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Tuesday, 30 December 2003 16:44:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:05 GMT