W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2003

Re: BIND vs RFC3253

From: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 13:25:42 -0800
Message-Id: <p06020403bc179d555d78@[129.46.227.161]>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>, webdav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>

>ever, looking at <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rfc-editor-rfc2223bis-07.txt>, section 2.11:
>
>         Updates
>
>            Specifies an earlier document whose contents are modified or
>            augmented by the new document.  The new document cannot be
>            used alone, it can only be used in conjunction with the
>            earlier document.
>
>So maybe we need to leave it as is...
>

Why doesn't "augmented" cover this case?  My reading of the text above is
that "it can only be used in conjunction with the earlier document" _for_the_
areas_of_overlap.  That is, you can update RFC XXXX and still have
material that is stand alone that is not overlapping with RFC XXXX.
				Ted
Received on Tuesday, 30 December 2003 16:26:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:05 GMT