>ever, looking at <http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-rfc-editor-rfc2223bis-07.txt>, section 2.11: > > Updates > > Specifies an earlier document whose contents are modified or > augmented by the new document. The new document cannot be > used alone, it can only be used in conjunction with the > earlier document. > >So maybe we need to leave it as is... > Why doesn't "augmented" cover this case? My reading of the text above is that "it can only be used in conjunction with the earlier document" _for_the_ areas_of_overlap. That is, you can update RFC XXXX and still have material that is stand alone that is not overlapping with RFC XXXX. TedReceived on Tuesday, 30 December 2003 16:26:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:05 GMT