W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2003

Re: Bind issues

From: Geoffrey M Clemm <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 08:34:53 -0500
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFA7D30ADD.63E43401-ON85256DF6.004A75C5-85256DF6.004A968C@us.ibm.com>
Julian's proposal sounds good to me.  I'm willing to help Julian 
write it.

Cheers,
Geoff

Julian wrote on 12/08/2003 04:27:52 AM:

> 
> Jason Crawford wrote:
> 
> > Perhaps another option is to create a separate rfc for GULP.   I 
assume 
> > it could be published faster that 2518bis and it could be referenced 
by 
> > multiple related documents without suggesting that it bears a special 
> > relationship with binding support.
> 
> I thought about that as well. How about a separate document called 
> "Locking Simplifications to WebDAV" that
> 
> - contains GULP
> - contains the locking clarifications from RFC2518bis (refresh, 
> lock-token header, submission of lock tokens)
> - contains the locking simplifications from RFC2518bis (lock-null)
> - contains the locking extensions from RFC2518bis as optional features 
> (DAV:rootlock)
> 
> This would become a Proposed Draft, updating but not obsoleting RFC2518 
> and RFC3253.
> 
> If we can agree on scope and procedure, I'm willing to help writing it.
> 
> Julian
> 
> -- 
> <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
> 
Received on Monday, 8 December 2003 08:35:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:05 GMT