Re: RFC Editors to WebDAV ordering protocol draft available

Geoffrey M Clemm wrote:

> The only changes I saw that needed to be rolled back were
> those in section 9.2.  Were there any others?
> 
> Cheers,
> Geoff

Yes, for instance the starting sequence of section 4.1.1:

"A DAV:ordering-type (protected) indicates  whether the...."

If changed from the previous shorter text, it should be something like;

"The DAV:ordering-type property indicates  whether the...."


Julian

-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760