The only changes I saw that needed to be rolled back were those in section 9.2. Were there any others? Cheers, Geoff Julian wrote on 12/03/2003 10:08:46 AM: > > Hi, > > I have updated the "latest" draft at > <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-ordering- > protocol-latest.html> > to include the editorial changes made by the RFC-Editor. > > To potential reviewers: this is absolutely the last opportunity to > complain about editorial issues. > > Note that some of those may be rolled back as they seem to change the > intended meaning of the text. > > Julian > > -- > <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760 > >Received on Wednesday, 3 December 2003 11:46:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:05 GMT