W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2003

Re: Review of draft-ietf-webdav-quota-02.txt

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 22:35:03 +0100
Message-ID: <3FB3F907.5000004@gmx.de>
To: Brian Korver <briank@xythos.com>
Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org

Brian Korver wrote:

> I'm planning to do so in today's meeting, but to restate for the mailing 
> list,
> Stefan pointed out that if we used quota-limit, then quota-limit would 
> not be
> a fixed value (which is the reason we defined things in terms of 
> quota-limit
> to begin with).  Thus, instead of quota-limit, the new draft uses NFS's
> quota-available.  This has the semantics that it isn't fixed.  Problem 
> solved.
> Note, quota-available is consistent with the rest of the the quota 
> definitions
> we pulled from NFS, so it's conceptually attractive too.
> 
> I still don't know what you find confusing, so I can't comment on that yet.

Brian, you may be right -- I'll have to re-review the change.

I'M still not convinced that handling both quota and disk space limits 
using the same properties is a good idea, especially as NFS does it 
differently.

Minor editorial note: RFC3010 has been obsoleted by a newer revision.

Julian


-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2003 16:35:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:05 GMT