W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2003

Re: Review of draft-ietf-webdav-quota-02.txt

From: Brian Korver <briank@xythos.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 15:06:12 -0600
Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Message-Id: <35F86684-161D-11D8-B03D-000393751598@xythos.com>

On Thursday, November 13, 2003, at 01:14  PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Brian,
> when I re-raised these issues, I *did* read the current draft. So I 
> think it's up to you to go back to the mailing list discussion and 
> explain why the concerns raised by Stefan and myself aren't valid.
> Julian


I'm planning to do so in today's meeting, but to restate for the 
mailing list,
Stefan pointed out that if we used quota-limit, then quota-limit would 
not be
a fixed value (which is the reason we defined things in terms of 
to begin with).  Thus, instead of quota-limit, the new draft uses NFS's
quota-available.  This has the semantics that it isn't fixed.  Problem 
Note, quota-available is consistent with the rest of the the quota 
we pulled from NFS, so it's conceptually attractive too.

I still don't know what you find confusing, so I can't comment on that 

Received on Thursday, 13 November 2003 16:06:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:28 UTC