- From: Brian Korver <briank@xythos.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 15:06:12 -0600
- To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
On Thursday, November 13, 2003, at 01:14 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > Brian, > > when I re-raised these issues, I *did* read the current draft. So I > think it's up to you to go back to the mailing list discussion and > explain why the concerns raised by Stefan and myself aren't valid. > > Julian Julian, I'm planning to do so in today's meeting, but to restate for the mailing list, Stefan pointed out that if we used quota-limit, then quota-limit would not be a fixed value (which is the reason we defined things in terms of quota-limit to begin with). Thus, instead of quota-limit, the new draft uses NFS's quota-available. This has the semantics that it isn't fixed. Problem solved. Note, quota-available is consistent with the rest of the the quota definitions we pulled from NFS, so it's conceptually attractive too. I still don't know what you find confusing, so I can't comment on that yet. -brian briank@xythos.com
Received on Thursday, 13 November 2003 16:06:35 UTC