W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2003

RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-01.txt

From: Dyer, Kevin <kevin.dyer@matrixone.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 22:15:19 -0500
Message-ID: <9150DCE0CCB4D411A7DB00508BB0DBF20520856D@msx1am.matrixone.net>
To: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Julian,

I agree with 1) on 2) are you talking about quotas? If so you are correct
but disk space is still 507, IMHO.

	Kevin

  >-----Original Message-----
  >From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de]
  >Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 8:15 AM
  >To: WebDAV
  >Subject: RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-01.txt
  >
  >
  >
  >Brian,
  >
  >here are two more issues I have:
  >
  >1) During the discussion, I've seen soft limits (quotas) and 
  >hard limits
  >(disk space) used in the same context. I'm really not sure 
  >that it is a good
  >idea to use the same mechanism for both.
  >
  >2) Related to that: I'm not sure that using 507 for failures 
  >due to quota
  >restrictions is a good idea. 5xx indicates a server error. 
  >In this case, the
  >problem is not causes by the server, but by the client 
  >(trying to take up
  >more space than allowed), so a 4xx with a new precondition 
  >code seems to be
  >more appropriate.
  >
  >Julian
  >
  >--
  ><green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
  >
Received on Monday, 24 March 2003 22:15:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:03 GMT