On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 03:34 PM, Clemm, Geoff wrote: > > I still vote for "SHOULD". In particular, given the problems > partial DELETE and partial MOVE can produce in a multiple binding > context, a server that supports multiple bindings to a resource > SHOULD do those operations atomically unless it > has a very good reason to do otherwise (e.g. the scenario I > posted earlier). > > Cheers, > Geoff > Geoff, Other than loops, what are the problems unique to multiple bindings and partial MOVE? -brian briank@xythos.comReceived on Friday, 7 March 2003 19:53:39 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:03 GMT