- From: Jason Crawford <nn683849@smallcue.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 12:17:55 -0500
- To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@Rational.Com>
- Cc: "'WebDAV'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
> I've posted a revised version of the binding draft to the > binding web site. Let me know what you think. > <http://www.webdav.org/bind/draft-ietf-webdav-bind-01.2.htm> Sorry to be a pain, but the reason we say that we are splitting in to DELETE and UNBIND is because some people claim that clients prefer the non-atomic DELETE functionality. But the new bindings document says that if the server can implement UNBIND, then DELETE should be implemented that way. This leaves me scratching my head. 1) Do users ever want the old DELETE functionality if they can have UNBIND? 2) If we really believe that they do, why do we suggest that the server do the UNBIND anyway? It sounds like we really haven't decided (1). Let's really decide that and then spec this to match what we resolve. J. ------------------------------------------ Phone: 914-784-7569, ccjason@us.ibm.com I do not check nn621779@smallcue.com
Received on Friday, 7 March 2003 12:19:19 UTC