W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2003

Re: GULP vs RFC2518bis

From: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 17:22:41 +0100
Cc: "'WebDAV'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
Message-Id: <051189C4-50B9-11D7-B755-00039384827E@greenbytes.de>

I think GULP should, with the proposed changes, go into RFC2518 bis.

LOCKing semantics need to be defined in 2518bis and not in any
side-track specification (sorry Goeff ;).

//Stefan

Am Freitag, 07.03.03, um 15:23 Uhr (Europe/Berlin) schrieb Julian 
Reschke:

>
> Hi.
>
> I'd really like to see some progress regarding this issue. In
>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2003JanMar/0281.html
>
> I have tried to rephrase GULP so that it doesn't require the term 
> "binding"
> anymore. This should address the concerns of those who fear that a
> dependency on the BIND spec is introduced.
>
> To those who did object to GULP being part of RFC2518bis *please* 
> review
> this?
>
> Julian
>
> --
> <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
>
Received on Friday, 7 March 2003 11:23:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:03 GMT