W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2003

RE: Bindings and Locks (was: bind draft issues)

From: Jason Crawford <nn683849@smallcue.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 11:22:43 -0500
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "WebDAV" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OFB6E2D312.1E78B313-ON85256CE0.0057EC00@us.ibm.com>




> > Yah.  That's a toughie.  It lists things that are both important to the
> > binding spec and the base 2518 spec.  But it also apparently
> > covers things that are outside the realm of each of these specs.
> > It might need to be submitted as a seperate document that clarifies
> > (and "unifies") both specs after they come out.
>
> Again strong disagreement.
Is it ever not "strong"? :-)

> Each of the paragraphs in GULP is needed to correctly explain RFC2518
> locking semantics. If you think there's something which *isn't* needed
for
> RFC2518, please point to it :-)

I step back from what I said.  I think it is possible to put the current
GULP
document in 2518bis.


------------------------------------------
Phone: 914-784-7569,   ccjason@us.ibm.com
I do not check nn621779@smallcue.com
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 2003 11:25:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:03 GMT