W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2003

Re: Bindings and Locks (was: bind draft issues)

From: Brian Korver <briank@xythos.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:57:08 -0800
To: WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-Id: <EF3AA708-4DA9-11D7-8A8F-000393751598@xythos.com>

On Saturday, March 1, 2003, at 06:27  AM, Clemm, Geoff wrote:
>    Bindings and Locks
>
>    The relationship between bindings and locks is missing
>    from the draft.  I think the behavior of locks and the
>    lock methods should be fully specified in this draft.
>
> RFC2518bis is in the process of finalizing the behavior of
> locks, and we do not want the bind draft to say anything that
> conflicts with this.  Instead, we will make sure that the
> locking model in RFC2518bis clearly defines locking behavior
> in the presence of multiple bindings.

It probably isn't a good idea to introduce a dependency
such as this, especially since 2518bis doesn't have any
notion of bindings.  I don't believe that the binding
document can move forward.

-brian
briank@xythos.com
Received on Monday, 3 March 2003 13:57:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:02 GMT