On Saturday, March 1, 2003, at 06:27 AM, Clemm, Geoff wrote: > Bindings and Locks > > The relationship between bindings and locks is missing > from the draft. I think the behavior of locks and the > lock methods should be fully specified in this draft. > > RFC2518bis is in the process of finalizing the behavior of > locks, and we do not want the bind draft to say anything that > conflicts with this. Instead, we will make sure that the > locking model in RFC2518bis clearly defines locking behavior > in the presence of multiple bindings. It probably isn't a good idea to introduce a dependency such as this, especially since 2518bis doesn't have any notion of bindings. I don't believe that the binding document can move forward. -brian briank@xythos.comReceived on Monday, 3 March 2003 13:57:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:02 GMT