W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2003

RE: RFC2518 issue: requiring ETags (Atlanta wg mtg)

From: John DeSoi <desoi@icx.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 08:26:09 -0500
Message-Id: <p05200f03ba83c141c084@[192.168.1.7]>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org

At 3:34 PM -0500 2/26/03, Jason Crawford wrote:
>Let's use the SHOULD and let implementers understand why they SHOULD
>implement strong Etags.  Let the implementers weigh the "difficulty" case
>against the benefit case themselves.   And let's let the implementors that
>don't follow through on the SHOULD know if they are impacting us as users
>and if we're tempted to use a different product.  I know that user feedback
>is a strong motivator for most software developers.

Further: There is more than one way to implement locking. My server 
already had a locking mechanism, so I had no desire to implement 
WebDAV locking at all. I just wanted a few features to make it easier 
for users to upload files. But then I got sucked into it because OS X 
refused to allow writes without locking. I found the locking part of 
WebDAV to be the most complex and problematic part to implement. At 
times it made me wish I had taken another approach.

Best,

John DeSoi, Ph.D.
Received on Thursday, 27 February 2003 08:29:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:02 GMT