W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 2003

RE: Reminder: WG Last Call on Ordered Collections

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 20:37:18 +0200
To: "B. Shadgar" <shadgar@cs.bris.ac.uk>, <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCKEOJHBAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>

> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of B. Shadgar
> Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 7:55 PM
> To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
> Cc: w3c-dist-auth
> Subject: Re: Reminder: WG Last Call on Ordered Collections
> ..
>
> Well, I was thinking that maybe the best use case of the Ordering
> protocol was
> regarded to the versioning of resources. In this case, I though
> if every time
> that a revision is created, a live property containing the name
> of resource was
>
> attached to the resource, maybe we didn't need to the new Ordered
> protocol.
>
> Does it make sense?

Now you got me confused :-) What's the relation of (1) resource names and
(2) versioning to ordering collection members?

Julian
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2003 14:37:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:04 GMT