W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 2003

RE: Reminder: WG Last Call on Ordered Collections

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 17:28:45 +0200
To: "B. Shadgar" <shadgar@cs.bris.ac.uk>, "WebDAV" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCMEOAHBAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>

> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of B. Shadgar
> Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2003 5:17 PM
> To: Jim Whitehead
> Cc: WebDAV
> Subject: Re: Reminder: WG Last Call on Ordered Collections
>
> ...
>
> May I ask about practical example or cases about WebDAV Ordered
> Collections
> protocol. It is not clear to me why we define new protocol when
> we have the
> search protocol's ordering option. In other words, which aspects
> of ordering
> can not be covered by the search protocol's ordering option.

See:
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-ordering-protocol-latest
.html#rfc.section.2.p.2>

--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Wednesday, 23 April 2003 11:28:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:04 GMT