W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2002

RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 20:35:17 +0200
To: "Lisa Dusseault" <lisa@xythos.com>, "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCIEGOFKAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>

> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Lisa Dusseault
> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 8:22 PM
> To: 'Julian Reschke'; w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org
> Subject: RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
>
>
>
> Why do you think this is preferable for the client?  Why not keep

It allows marshalling of multiple quota constraints (and we know that there
may be more than one).

> single-property, single-value?  This complicates things even for the
> server.

Why? For a server that enforces only a single constraint, it's just a few
more XML tags to add. Where's the problem?

Confused,

Julian

--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Thursday, 24 October 2002 14:35:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:02 GMT