Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt

We're in agreement then, both WRT the units used and the property name. 
When I said 'bytes' in my previous message I meant 8-bit bytes, or more 
specifically octets. Uniformity is a good thing, provided that the 
documentation is clear and readily available.

Elias


Clemm, Geoff wrote:

> Just to clarify, the proposal I was supporting was to replace
> bytes with octets, not to leave the units unspecified.  I don't
> think anyone wants to leave the units unspecified.  There is a
> separate question of whether the units should to appear in the
> property name ... I'd probably leave it off, for uniformity with
> the rest of HTTP (it is the "Length" header, not the "Octet-Length"
> header).
>