W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2002

Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt

From: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:44:08 +0200
Cc: Webdav WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>
Message-Id: <C2B9DF12-E72C-11D6-9950-00039384827E@greenbytes.de>


Am Mittwoch, 23.10.02, um 21:39 Uhr (Europe/Berlin) schrieb Clemm, 
Geoff:

> Possibly we should have two pairs of standard properties:
>
> DAV:quota
> DAV:quota-used

That would be "space-left-on-device" and not a quota. Certainly
every file system has it, but clients are more concerned
with the per-user quotas. Do you see a need to define these
properties?

> DAV:current-user-quota
> DAV:current-user-quota-used
>
> (analogous to the way the ACL draft as current-user privileges)
>
> Cheers,
> Geoff
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:00 PM
> To: Brian Korver
> Cc: Webdav WG
> Subject: RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
>
>
>
> Brian,
>
> > From: Brian Korver [mailto:briank@xythos.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 8:56 PM
> > To: Julian Reschke
> > Cc: Webdav WG
> > Subject: Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
> >
> >
> > On Wednesday, October 23, 2002, at 10:05 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> > > This kind of quota system is incompatible with the quota system in 
> a
> > > Unix
> > > filesystem (where AFAIK it's per user) -- a standard proposal must 
> be
> > > able
> > > to handle these kinds of systems as well.
> >
> > In BSD anyhow, quotas are applied to users and/or groups.  That said,
> > "collection quotas" (if we can even call them that) are generally 
> enforced
> > by mounting appropriately-sized partitions.  Just FYI.
>
> Interesting. So if we take groups into account, we'll need a more 
> flexible
> reporting mechanism, right?
>
> Julian
>
> --
> <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
>
Received on Thursday, 24 October 2002 04:45:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:02 GMT