W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2002

RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt

From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:39:51 -0400
Message-ID: <E4F2D33B98DF7E4880884B9F0E6FDEE25ED4D5@SUS-MA1IT01>
To: Webdav WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Possibly we should have two pairs of standard properties:

DAV:quota
DAV:quota-used

DAV:current-user-quota
DAV:current-user-quota-used

(analogous to the way the ACL draft as current-user privileges)

Cheers,
Geoff

-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:00 PM
To: Brian Korver
Cc: Webdav WG
Subject: RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt



Brian,

> From: Brian Korver [mailto:briank@xythos.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 8:56 PM
> To: Julian Reschke
> Cc: Webdav WG
> Subject: Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt
>
>
> On Wednesday, October 23, 2002, at 10:05 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> > This kind of quota system is incompatible with the quota system in a
> > Unix
> > filesystem (where AFAIK it's per user) -- a standard proposal must be
> > able
> > to handle these kinds of systems as well.
>
> In BSD anyhow, quotas are applied to users and/or groups.  That said,
> "collection quotas" (if we can even call them that) are generally enforced
> by mounting appropriately-sized partitions.  Just FYI.

Interesting. So if we take groups into account, we'll need a more flexible
reporting mechanism, right?

Julian

--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Wednesday, 23 October 2002 15:40:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:02 GMT