W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2002

Re: BIND vs. non-movable resources in RFC3253

From: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 18:49:27 +0200
Cc: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org
To: Jason Crawford <nn683849@smallcue.com>
Message-Id: <39E69588-E5DE-11D6-9950-00039384827E@greenbytes.de>

+1

//Stefan

Am Dienstag, 22.10.02, um 18:46 Uhr (Europe/Berlin) schrieb Jason 
Crawford:

> This seems to be a discussion of "bindings and versioning", not 
> bindings.
>
> I think the binding spec should allow servers to reject DELETE/MOVE
> requests.
> The binding spec should not be concerned about all the possible 
> reasons a
> server might reject a request, and in particular it shouldn't devote 
> any
> time to
> versioning specific reasons a server might reject a request.
>
> If a particular spec, like the versioning spec, has a particular 
> semantic
> constraints
> that it wants to support, it can spec that DELETE/MOVE should not be
> supported
> in the situations where DELETE/MOVE would break those semantic
> constraints.
>
> Can we agree that servers can reject DELETE/MOVE requests and move the
> versioning specific discussion to the versioning mailing list?
>
> J.
>
> ------------------------------------------
> Phone: 914-784-7569
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 22 October 2002 12:50:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:02 GMT