- From: Jason Crawford <nn683849@smallcue.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 02:39:28 -0400
- To: "Michael Leditschke" <mike@ammd.com.au>
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
> 1. A null resource is locked. > Q. Should this resource appear as a member > URI of its parent? Yes, it should appear. All versions of the spec say it should. > IE displays the lock-null > resource as a directory, which doesn't seem right. A directory? At the protocol level? Or just in the gui? > 2. The null resource is unlocked. > Q. Should there be anything left if no other > command is issued in between? rfc2518 says there should be nothing. rfc2518bis (new spec) says there should be a resource. > IE also continues to show the now unlocked resource as > a directory, but it doesn't act as a collection, e.g. > you can't create members within it. rfc2518 does specify some odd lock-null behavior while it's still locked, but neither protocol specifies any odd behavior after unlocked. > I suspect this is as > a result of the Slide behaviour. Check at the protocol level to determine what's happening there. The gui might just make it look like a directory even if the protocol is doing something different. > Any clarifications greatly appreciated. Let us know what you discover. J.
Received on Wednesday, 4 September 2002 02:40:38 UTC