The proposal makes sense to me, as does the error condition name. Elias Julian Reschke wrote: >- REPORT not defined for this depth --> 400 (bad request) > >- REPORT is defined, but server doesn't allow depth infinity --> 403 >(forbidden). Should we define an error condition name for this situation and >add that to the RFC3253 (proposal: "DAV:depth-infinity-allowed")? >Received on Friday, 9 August 2002 14:06:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 October 2007 17:53:17 GMT