W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > July to September 2002

Re: PROPFIND vs REPORT vs depth infinity

From: Elias Sinderson <elias@cse.ucsc.edu>
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 11:06:01 -0700
Message-ID: <3D540489.3080204@cse.ucsc.edu>
To: WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>

The proposal makes sense to me, as does the error condition name.

Elias

Julian Reschke wrote:

>- REPORT not defined for this depth --> 400 (bad request)
>
>- REPORT is defined, but server doesn't allow depth infinity --> 403
>(forbidden). Should we define an error condition name for this situation and
>add that to the RFC3253 (proposal: "DAV:depth-infinity-allowed")?
>
Received on Friday, 9 August 2002 14:06:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:01 GMT