W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > July to September 2002

RE: root of a lock, was HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 17:45:53 +0200
To: "Dan Brotsky" <dbrotsky@adobe.com>, <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCMEHPEOAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>

> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Dan Brotsky
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 5:37 PM
> To: w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org
> Subject: Re: root of a lock, was HOW_TO_IDENTIFY_LOCK_OWNER
>
>
>
> On Monday, July 8, 2002, at 04:24 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> > So do we have agreement that *any* of the URIs affected by a deep lock
> > can
> > be used to do the UNLOCK operation?
>
> Yes.  (My earlier wording reflected a different confusion about the
> conversation Geoff and I were having. :^)

In the meantime I can confirm that indeed this is what moddav and Xythos
implement (IIS doesn't seem to support deep locks).
Received on Monday, 8 July 2002 11:46:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:01 GMT