Thanks for the feedback! I will change RFC2518bis so that it no longer deprecates allprop, just redefines it. lisa > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Brotsky [mailto:dbrotsky@adobe.com] > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 8:36 AM > To: w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org > Subject: Re: New RFC2518bis draft > > > On Saturday, July 6, 2002, at 04:33 PM, Clemm, Geoff wrote: > > > Lisa: I noticed that you did not respond to Julian's concern > > about deprecating DAV:allprop. Does this mean that you agree with > > his proposal to have it mean "2518 properties and all dead properties"? > > Note that I am happy to have DAV:allprop be given this interpretation. > > > > Cheers, > > Geoff > > I am also happy with changing DAV:allprop to be given this > interpretation. I also do NOT want deprecation done of DAV:allprop. I > think this can be a simple clarification without damaging existing > client interoperability (given the existing actual behavior of servers) > or introducing confusion for new ones. > > danReceived on Monday, 8 July 2002 12:35:43 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 12 October 2007 17:53:17 GMT