W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > July to September 2001

RE: Webdav issue: UNLOCK_BY_NON_LOCK_OWNERS

From: Jason Crawford <ccjason@us.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2001 12:19:46 -0400
To: "Eric Sedlar" <eric.sedlar@oracle.com>
Cc: "Webdav WG" <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Message-ID: <OFE16539C4.273F7A87-ON85256AAC.001BE413@watson.ibm.com>

<<
The other issue, Geoff, is that people are using LOCK as a poor person's
CHECKOUT, also assuming that LOCK's won't timeout.
>>
I agree.

<<
  The RFC2518 revision
should clearly state that LOCKs aren't to be used for this purpose.
>>
???? - I assume the purpose of locking is to avoid lost updates.  What is
the distinction between a "poor man's CHECKOUT"  and "avoidance of the lost
update problem"?   In the absense of actual versioning, aren't they the
same?

J.
Received on Sunday, 19 August 2001 12:26:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:56 GMT