RE: rfc2518 issue: LOCK_REFRESH_BY_METHODS

Sounds good to me Geoff.   Do we have any other comments?  Agreement?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


I'd just delete the paragraph in 9.8 that states:

   The timeout counter SHOULD be restarted any time an owner of the lock
   sends a method to any member of the lock, including unsupported
   methods, or methods which are unsuccessful.  However the lock MUST be
   refreshed if a refresh LOCK method is successfully received.

The last sentence is redundant, since it is already specified in the
LOCK semantics.

Cheers,
Geoff