- From: Jason Crawford <ccjason@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 15:11:56 -0400
- To: "Lisa Dusseault" <lisa@xythos.com>
- Cc: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@Rational.Com>, <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
It sounds like we all agree with Geoff's wording. Lisa did make an interesting observation below though. << This means that LOCK can return 201, which is important to distingusih between LOCK of an unmapped URL (I can go ahead and put my content) and LOCK of URL that somebody else just created (I should NOT send my content before checking). >> Do we want to enhance Geoff's explanation or add a comment along the lines of Lisa's observation? Or just make sure we mention 201 where we list potential error codes for LOCK requests? J.
Received on Thursday, 9 August 2001 15:28:26 UTC