RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource

> Just double checked MKCOL. It of course returns 201 upon success,
> never 200.
> So your above suggestion would match MKCOL as well. Assuming no errors,
> expected behaviour would be:
>
> 1) Client issues LOCK, "creating" an LNR, returns 201.
> 2) Client issues PUT or MKCOL on the LNR, either of which return 201.
>

That certainly would be my preference for the behavior.  I've added a note
in the issues list about this.

- Jim