W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 2001

RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource

From: Tim Ellison <Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:24:33 +0100
To: "WebDAV WG" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OFB340A423.25986EDD-ON80256A72.00335BDF@portsmouth.uk.ibm.com>

"Jim Whitehead" <ejw@cse.ucsc.edu> wrote:

[snip] lots of stuff we agree on

> > Moving the server state of an 'unmapped-URL where the immediate
> > parent exists' from no resource to a resource should, IMHO,
> > respond with 201 Created.
>
> This makes sense to me. My concern is that it would still be nice for the
> first PUT after a lock-null is created to also return a 201.

I don't see why?  The resource has already been created and the PUT is
simply modifying the existing resource.  What is the basis of your concern?

Tim
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2001 05:50:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:56 GMT