- From: Jason Crawford <ccjason@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 15:28:46 -0400
- To: "Kevin Wiggen" <wiggs@wiggenout.com>
- Cc: "WebDAV WG" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
<< <D:prop> <theprop attr1="foo"/> <theprop attr1="bar"/> <theprop attr2="fee"/> </D:prop> >> I agree that this is not acceptable unless attr1 and attr2 are namespace attributes that alter the effective tag name of the property name tags. This does lead me to another question though. If in the PROPPATCH call there are xmlns attributes on the propertyupdate, set, or prop tags that could potentially affect the tags within the property value, is the server responsible for collecting those and representing those in PROPPATCH responses? Or should we require that the client put any xmlns attributes that it cares about on the propertyname tag and within? J.
Received on Friday, 13 April 2001 15:30:53 UTC