W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 2001


From: Jason Crawford <ccjason@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 15:28:46 -0400
To: "Kevin Wiggen" <wiggs@wiggenout.com>
Cc: "WebDAV WG" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OFB1ED323A.852C2B75-ON85256A2D.006970B1@pok.ibm.com>

  <theprop attr1="foo"/>
  <theprop attr1="bar"/>
  <theprop attr2="fee"/>
I agree that this is not acceptable unless attr1 and attr2 are namespace
attributes that alter the effective tag name of the property name tags.

This does lead me to another question though.  If in the PROPPATCH call
there are xmlns attributes on the propertyupdate, set, or prop tags that
could potentially affect the tags within the property value, is the server
responsible for collecting those and representing those in PROPPATCH
responses?   Or should we require that the client put any xmlns attributes
that it cares about on the propertyname tag and within?

Received on Friday, 13 April 2001 15:30:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:23 UTC