- From: Slein, Judith A <JSlein@crt.xerox.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2000 17:06:13 -0500
- To: "'Joe Orton'" <joe@orton.demon.co.uk>, "Slein, Judith A" <JSlein@crt.xerox.com>
- Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
Oops. sorry. I was confusing a couple of different issues. So forget the remarks about parallels to collections. The comment at IETF 46 was just that someone might find a use for an entity-body on redirect references, so we should allow it. That would mean allowing PUT and GET to work on redirect references. --Judy > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Orton [mailto:joe@orton.demon.co.uk] > Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2000 4:14 PM > To: Slein, Judith A > Cc: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > Subject: Re: Bodies of redirect reference resources > > > > I was just looking back at my notes from the November 1999 > IETF meeting. > > This change was made in response to comments there that we > should make > > redirect references analogous to collections with respect > to an entity-body. > > I'm not sure I understand this: PUT is undefined/disallowed on a > collection, and GET on a collection is defined to return "something or > other"... not very analogous to the entity-body storing > GET/PUT behaviour > for RR resources? > > joe >
Received on Thursday, 3 February 2000 17:06:28 UTC