- From: John Stracke <francis@ecal.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 11:41:23 -0400
- To: dav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Greg Stein wrote:
> Just a few comments:
>
> * rather than specifying the uri as an XML attribute, shouldn't it be
> part of the elem contents? [I think I saw an argument somehwere (by
> Yaron?) that stated is was "best form" to avoid attributes that are
> specifiers, rather than modifiers]
Mmm...yes, OK, that makes sense. Do you think <DAV:namespace> should contain the URI directly, or
contain <DAV:href>? The former reduces bandwidth & complexity by a tiny amount; the latter leverages the
existing definitions better.
> * do you want to explicitly state that <DAV:namespaces> can only appear
> as a child of <DAV:allprop> and <DAV:propname> ?
Yes, that makes sense. Here's my new text:
Purpose: The namespaces XML element introduces a set of namespace elements (below).
<namespaces> appears inside <allprop> or <propname>, and specifies that the PROPFIND request
applies only to properties belonging to the namespaces listed in the enclosed namespace
elements.
> * your sample request in 5.2 has the propname/propfind end-elements
> swapped.
Whoops, so it does. Fixed.
--
/==============================================================\
|John Stracke | http://www.ecal.com |My opinions are my own.|
|Chief Scientist |=============================================|
|eCal Corp. |Peace, justice, morality, culture, family, |
|francis@ecal.com|sport, and the extinction of all other life |
| |forms! |
\==============================================================/
Received on Monday, 20 September 1999 11:41:50 UTC